Latest topics
3616 and 3619 review
Page 1 of 1 • Share
Re: 3616 and 3619 review
In the gallery pics I cannot distinguish between the handles of the 3616 and 3619.
???
???
Jeremy Ashford- Number of posts : 3150
Location : Whangarei, New Zealand
Registration date : 2010-09-11
Re: 3616 and 3619 review
Jeremy Ashford wrote:In the gallery pics I cannot distinguish between the handles of the 3616 and 3619.
???
I will have to check that out when time permits ....
Re: 3616 and 3619 review
3619 from the Portage Ceramics site ..... what are your thoughts Jeremy?
http://www.nzmuseums.co.nz/account/3384/object/489929/Cup_-_bisque
http://www.nzmuseums.co.nz/account/3384/object/489929/Cup_-_bisque
3616 and 3619 review
OK.
I'd like to see them (3616, 3619) side by side to see what the difference is.
I'm still on holiday bludging wifi so I will look compare Portage pics when I get home.
I'd like to see them (3616, 3619) side by side to see what the difference is.
I'm still on holiday bludging wifi so I will look compare Portage pics when I get home.
Jeremy Ashford- Number of posts : 3150
Location : Whangarei, New Zealand
Registration date : 2010-09-11
Re: DC8 Air NZ cup and others ..
I am confused, why are we wondering about 3616 & 3619 on this thread which is about DC8 Air NZ ? The bowl shape of the cups may be similar or the same but it is the handles on the original DC8 and the current copy that was the starting question and the shape is stated earlier in the thread as 3010.
Last edited by Jonno on Fri 2 Jan - 16:48; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : Add further info to clarify)
Jonno- Number of posts : 662
Location : Milford,Auckland
Registration date : 2011-05-13
Re: 3616 and 3619 review
I agree Jonno as that is very off topic and I will move those posts to a new thread.
Reply to Jonno
Jonno,
As there is no number or description in the gallery to fit the Air New Zealand cup with the different handle I just wanted to be certain that the picture for 3619 in the gallery was correct, and not just a duplicate of the 3616 shape.
Ev has confirmed, after consulting with the Portage Ceramics Trust website, that the gallery picture for 3619 is correct.
The 3616 has a "781 handle" and the 3619 has its "own 3619 handle" but there is little to distinguish the two from the gallery photos alone.
I have cups in this shape (one or the other, or both) but have not had a chance to make a close comparison as I have been away from home, nor have I had the opportunity to search the original postings for the two numbers (for lack of wifi).
As there is no number or description in the gallery to fit the Air New Zealand cup with the different handle I just wanted to be certain that the picture for 3619 in the gallery was correct, and not just a duplicate of the 3616 shape.
Ev has confirmed, after consulting with the Portage Ceramics Trust website, that the gallery picture for 3619 is correct.
The 3616 has a "781 handle" and the 3619 has its "own 3619 handle" but there is little to distinguish the two from the gallery photos alone.
I have cups in this shape (one or the other, or both) but have not had a chance to make a close comparison as I have been away from home, nor have I had the opportunity to search the original postings for the two numbers (for lack of wifi).
Jeremy Ashford- Number of posts : 3150
Location : Whangarei, New Zealand
Registration date : 2010-09-11
Re: 3616 and 3619 review
I thought it would be handy to have this pic in this topic.

All the 3616/3619 cups I have seen appear to have the same handle, which is bigger than a 781 handle, so I assume that they are 3619s.
We need to see two different ones side by side for comparison.
3616 is dated 7.11.67.
Ev, does the drawing above have a date?
As it shows the 5616 it will be after 23.3.68
Gotta stop. This is doing my head in.

All the 3616/3619 cups I have seen appear to have the same handle, which is bigger than a 781 handle, so I assume that they are 3619s.
We need to see two different ones side by side for comparison.
3616 is dated 7.11.67.
Ev, does the drawing above have a date?
As it shows the 5616 it will be after 23.3.68
Gotta stop. This is doing my head in.
Jeremy Ashford- Number of posts : 3150
Location : Whangarei, New Zealand
Registration date : 2010-09-11
Re: 3616 and 3619 review
3616 has the 781 handle
3619 has it's own handle
This is what it says in the records and in the gallery.
I only have one, so am not able to photograph both together.
The drawings are from the Modellers records and there are no dates. There is another series of records that I will check out with each page devoted to a single shape and these have dates and are signed off by Tam Mitchell.
The hand written records that have the dates are from the Shape Code of New Numbers records.
3619 has it's own handle
This is what it says in the records and in the gallery.
I only have one, so am not able to photograph both together.
The drawings are from the Modellers records and there are no dates. There is another series of records that I will check out with each page devoted to a single shape and these have dates and are signed off by Tam Mitchell.
The hand written records that have the dates are from the Shape Code of New Numbers records.
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
» Catherine Anselmi 1992 beautiful vase
» More Kevin Kilsby for gallery
» Orange and other colours No Namer
» Richmond Crown Lynn Pattern no. 146 for the Gallery
» More Roses courtesy of leish ...
» Kelston Potteries No Name Pink Rose
» Katherine Pat.No. 896 courtesy of fi
» Hampshire Pat.No.919