NEW ZEALAND POTTERY
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Latest topics
» Need help with identification of mark
four digit 1029 ... and a knockoff? EmptyTue 11 Aug - 18:34 by Ev

» Tiki pot was made by Crown Lynn
four digit 1029 ... and a knockoff? EmptyMon 10 Aug - 20:05 by Ev

» X marks the pot!
four digit 1029 ... and a knockoff? EmptyMon 10 Aug - 18:51 by Johnnyz

» Amber Hand Crafted Vase
four digit 1029 ... and a knockoff? EmptyMon 10 Aug - 16:47 by Ev

» NZG Backstamp
four digit 1029 ... and a knockoff? EmptyMon 10 Aug - 13:00 by tabbyland

» Elaine Cole
four digit 1029 ... and a knockoff? EmptySat 8 Aug - 19:38 by JanPots

» Mini miniature, salesmans sample or handpotted? Is this the smallest Crown Lynn vase of all?
four digit 1029 ... and a knockoff? EmptySat 8 Aug - 11:57 by Ev

» The Rhodes Urban Myth has been busted !!!
four digit 1029 ... and a knockoff? EmptySat 8 Aug - 11:31 by Ev

» Orzel Industries Gladiators
four digit 1029 ... and a knockoff? EmptySat 8 Aug - 11:16 by Ev


four digit 1029 ... and a knockoff?

Go down

four digit 1029 ... and a knockoff? Empty four digit 1029 ... and a knockoff?

Post  Jeremy Ashford on Fri 10 Jan - 16:52

Crown Lynn usually managed a great degree of precision,
and regularity in its cups and mugs.
I have a 1029 mug and a mug that looks very like it:
four digit 1029 ... and a knockoff? 120911
Left is 1029: Right I just don't know

The apparent height difference in the photo is real.
1029 is 100mm clear high but the other tries hard and fails 95mm.
Widths at top are 76 and 72 respectively.
The handle is also slightly smaller
four digit 1029 ... and a knockoff? 120912
Footrings are 63 and 58 OD.
The strange mug has no markings.

The small difference in dimension maked a sizeable difference
in volume contained: 350ml down to 310.
The fettling is not of the quality expected from Crown Lynn.
The banding pattern is less clearly defined.

I know from the mugs 1078 and 1329 that Crown Lynn did produce variations,
but I think this might be a copy.
If a mould was taken from a 1029 mug then consequent shrinkages entailed in that process could account for the size differences.

I know Studio Ceramics has been reproducing some of the more popular Crown Lynn items but surely this mug does not qualify.

Any thoughts?
Jeremy Ashford
Jeremy Ashford

Number of posts : 3150
Location : Whangarei, New Zealand
Registration date : 2010-09-11

Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum